Collusion in the White House

Looks like Trump will withdraw the US from the Climate Accord and democrats/liberals are upset.

First off, the Climate Accord is neither binding on the US, or even legal, because Congress never approved the accord, since it is a not a treaty, as specified by the Constitution

Second, Obama and world leaders openly COLLUDED to circumvent not only approval by Congress, but by fiat, to circumvent the US Constitution.

Third, the same democrat/liberals that are upset at the US withdrawing from an illegal treaty are the same ones that COLLUDED with Obama to bind the US to the accord.

Fourth, the same democrats/liberals are projecting their actions onto Trump by accusing him of colluding, without any proof, just supposition, with Russia to get elected.

It seem all the things the democrats/liberals are saying is what they know of themselves and want for themselves and afraid Trump will do unto them what they did unto America during Obama’s 8 years in office.

Obama cut corners and abused his powers to try and bind the US to the accord, like he did many other things, without seeking to make it a lasting, legal and durable treaty. Anyone that is angry that Trump will withdraw the US from the ACCORD, not TREATY, only have themselves to blame regardless of whether that person or persons are foreign or domestic.

I would hope that Trump would assemble a panel of all climate scientists, regardless of their position on the issue, to do unbiased, non-partisan and TRUE science rather then a bunch of idiots behaving like children that attack someone who says otherwise just to protect their funding. Those children, during the 1970’s, claimed the world was entering a new ice age and that we must stop burning fossil fuels, so their credibility is already suspect. It is whatever excuse can be used and herd the non-science public into backing their biased and bigoted positions on the climate.

My position is there is global warming, but it is not in the skies, but at our feet, in our cities – the heat islands that change weather patterns. No matter how clean the sky, it can absorb only so much heat and heat generation has to be reduced. But climate alarmists don’t bring that up because it would mean explaining that people have to cut back on all the lights used and air conditioning, especially on large buildings and those people, those citizens have to pay for it.

Alternative energy? All that does is let people go on, willy-nilly, generating heat and feel good about it.

In conclusion, fix it and fix it right instead of using short-term, ill thought-out ideas that are just a band-aid. Don’t throw money for funding at people trying to cheat you and scare you. Fix the cause, not the effect. Do real science instead of using bigotry, hate and greed to scare people. It’s time for real HONESTY on the climate because it is more then man-made.

Did the Russians help Trump? No, they helped themselves and they are continuing to do so

Did the Russians help Trump? No, they helped themselves and they are continuing to do so. There is this news report of Putin again interfering with America not to support Trump, as it might seem, but to pit one side against another and cause civil war.

To me, it seems Putin doesn’t really care who is president as long as he can turn Americans against one another to create a vacuum in the world that Russia can exploit. If Hillary had been elected the revelations would have continued till America was wrapped up in her impeachment.

And Trump, he’s not safe from Russian meddling, just read about Huey Long. It won’t be Russia that does the deed, apparently, but it will be Russia nonetheless. Though liberals might welcome that, they won’t welcome the consequences of persecution and imprisonment en masse.

Trump won the election fair and square, Hillary’s mistakes go back decades and Obama putting loyal Dems out of work gave Trump the election. Messing with ballot boxes was too trivial – and traceable – for Russia. It was people’s heads they wanted to mess with and create lasting dissension, civil war and the breakup of the US and he IS WINNING as long as people let it last.

The solution is recognize what is happening, put the past behind us and unite. We need to see that the extremism that the right and left has brought us – and quite possibly the world – to the destruction of everything.

Without a return to moderation and common sense the world will wind up in a nuclear war that will take care of all the problems. Each of the world’s players think they can control the chaos but people are not that easily controlled and there is a lot of anger that remains unresolved.

Make peace or face nuclear winter – it’s not a choice, it’s a responsibility

Why Hillary Lost (hint, it wasn’t the Russians)

I recently read where a celebrity (will they ever get a clue) pointed out 75% of America did not vote for Trump, which is true enough but not completely honest. 75% of America did not vote for Hillary either.

Looking at the adult population total – 242,470,820 and that each candidate got roughly 60,000,000 votes (yes, I know Hillary got more, but I said ROUGHLY) there is the 25% for each and the 75% that didn’t vote for either.

Going into the election, it was obvious that each candidate had a lock on 20% of the vote (total between the two of 40% locked up) and that there 60% of the vote to be had to determine who won. Of that 60%, each candidate only managed to get 5 PERCENT of that 60%.

What did Hillary do? She appealed to the locked in base and rarely ventured beyond them, which was the big cities. She attempted, as she did in 2008, that she was invincible, that it was her due and if you selected her, you’d get your due and it would be more of the same, but with polish.

She forgot what 2008 meant – she lost. For me it was the deplorables comment. I wasn’t going to vote, but she shot her mouth off about people who are my friends who I know to be good and decent and I voted for Trump. It wasn’t what I wanted, but it was the decision Clinton made for me.

What did Trump do. He appealed to his base and then went out and expanded it by going everywhere and doing it several times. He drilled his message in and appealed to the disadvantaged that the Democratic Party had left behind with their, “we know what is best for you” attitude and put them out of work without any corresponding effort to create jobs and trusting to the market (liberals trusting the market, ha!) to put those people to work.

The 5% that elected Trump were DEMOCRATS tired of their party’s ineffectiveness and not thinking things through (or maybe thinking it through and the affects were deliberate) and not taking care of their people. The first rule of a good leader is “take care of your people” and Obama didn’t and they took Obama’s and the Democratic Party’s failings out on Hillary.

Hillary was no innocent and the Russians didn’t make those choices for her since being fired from the Watergate committee in 1973 and the repetitive mistakes that led to scandal after scandal since. It just took pointing out her character, which covered 40 years that she couldn’t be trusted. Clinton is a recidivist that can’t be rehabilitated.

Biggest mistake was handling the Sanders supporters and betraying them as soon as she had Sanders endorsement. The Sanders supporters were saying the same things about Clinton as did the right and they “voted” with their feet away from Clinton . . . . and worse for Sanders if he ever runs again for the feeling those supporters have of being sold out for gain by Sanders.

Ask those people about Obama, and his fellow Democrats, that he put out of work, why they voted as they did.

When voting, people vote emotions, like the Sanders supporters or they vote their pocketbook like the disaffected Democrats. The Sanders people, except the sheep, stuck to their beliefs and either didn’t vote or voted for Jill Stein.

The Democrats, that slim element, in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, which gave Trump the win, voted their pocketbooks that ANY POLL should of caught. And Trump has delivered, doing more in one month then Obama did in 8 years, which has to be embarrassing and proves that Obama was never qualified to be president because he-just-couldn’t-deliver and never learned how.

Obama did prove that just anyone could be president and opened the door for someone like Trump.

So why the emphasis that the Russians defeated Clinton?

Everyone (the liberals at least) thought they had a “sure-thing” and, of course, they had to be cheated like all the losers throughout history that bet on a sure-thing and they cannot come to terms they cheated themselves by picking a better bet.

So, the future, what does it hold for the Democratic Party? There is the example of the Occupy: Wall Street movement, which imploded because everyone wanted to follow what they thought was the “right” goal and no one could achieve consensus – and you can already see this in the Democratic Party attempt to recover. You have gender rights, black rights, hispanic rights and all the other groups through the rainbow spectrum each attempting to gain control.

What do the Democrats need to recover? They need Donald Trump – a populist who can go out and do revival tent shows and drum up support from the doubters. But for Trump and any populist is the lesson of Huey Long.

Will Trump succeed? No. Will the Democrats succeed? No. The saying “empire follows the sun” is true, but it is not just America’s day in the sun that has passed, it is the whole planet. There is a new day coming, but a new dark age first. People’s greed made it so and that is the one thing you can count on.

So who did Hillary in? Partly herself, partly Obama, partly the Democratic National Committee. Each forgot that when you stick your head in the sand, people can still see that (you’re) ass.

If the Democrats want any legitimacy going forward, they will need to admit they lost and that it was their own fault, otherwise the cries of illegitimacy will come back to haunt them just like the Obama years already have.

 

 

Helping Syria Help Itself

“President Obama is accusing Republicans, who oppose allowing Syrian refugees into the U.S., of being scared of widows and orphans. He says the political posturing “needs to stop”

What Obama is actually saying is the GOP needs to stop opposing Obama and affecting his legacy.

America has no problem with taking in “widows and orphans” or women, children and elderly of any stripe. It is all the military age men that is the real problem. Why is it that these men are not back in Syria standing up and fighting for their homes, their families and their country instead of running?

Standing up to protect and fight is an american virtue, too, Mr President. So why don’t you help those men do just that instead of mindlessly and egoistical shooting off your mouth?

America is about helping people help themselves, but you don’t seem to understand that, do you, Mr President? You never had the chance to learn that and that is what has been wrong with your Presidency all along


Obama On Charleston Shooting

Obama On Charleston Shooting: We as a country will have to reckon with the fact that this type of mass violence does not happen in other advanced countries.

Doesn’t the president pay attention to what is happening across the world as a whole, across all continents without regard for how advanced or not a country is?

Religious extremism is the order of the day, not the exception.

Europe suffers beheadings, grenade attacks and large scale riots that the US doesn’t.

In Europe, all of Europe, the police routinely patrol carrying automatic weapons as their standard weapons.

Europe essentially is a police state that is constantly prepared to crackdown on dissent caused by economic poverty.

The President stuck his head in the sand and denied religious extremism exists and when it is brought home to him, he denies it exists still. He insists that what happens in America is the exception and not the rule.

The President stuck his head in the sand and ignored what ISIS represented and people died for that and that blood is on his hands.

And now, all he wants is to use Charleston as a pretext to go after gun owners and pretend the rest of the world doesn’t exist. That larger violence happens everyday on every continent. That groups like Boko Haram don’t exist, that they don’t kidnap and kill in such large numbers it becomes just a statistic.

Greater violence exists in the world and the question is why it’s not worse then it is in America and what it is that helps fan the fires of hatred in America, such as a President that has set back civil rights 50 years by allowing the DOJ to prosecute as they see fit and ignore laws as they see fit..

Civil rights must be for all people all the time or violence happens. We have yet to truly experience religious extremism, but it is coming.

Radical Islamic Terrorism

Headline- Cruz: Can’t Win War Against Our Enemies If Obama ‘Unwilling’ to Say the Words ‘Radical Islamic Terrorism’

This is one of those arguments about semantics, so to narrow the point of contention, I limit it to an American view.

An extremist is one who, within the boundaries of their own country seeks to destabilize and take over control of the country. The best example of this is Iran

A terrorist is one who goes outside the boundaries of their country to intimidate other nations to force a change of attitude. The 9/11 attacks are an example of that.

So the goal is the determining factor and in some cases, like the Oklahoma City bombing, a person can be both an extremist and a terrorist. In fact it could be argued that to be a terrorist you have to be an extremist, but not necessarily the other way around.

There is this explanation of what a foreign power is and to be an agent of, which a person trying to join ISIS would be violating (section B, 2). To accuse people of terrorism for wanting to help and fight with ISIS is not terrorism, it is not even sedition or treason as long as their actions are not directed at America.

Section 3 could be quite unconstitutional because while not vague is overly broad.

So while Pres Obama is criticized for not calling a spade a spade, that is not true. What he is doing is the sin of omission, as in, telling the truth but not the whole truth. Yes, America has an ongoing fight with extremists, which Pres Obama has admitted. But what he fails to say is that these people are motivated by religion and that they carry the fight to our shores in the form of extremism.

Cause and effect and the president only wants to deal the effect, not the cause, and as long as that goes on, the cause goes on.